“Look at this incident rationally, as any incident of this severity should be. The police had every opportunity to arrest de Menezes before he even got close to the underground. They didn’t. Instead they chose to use lethal force in a manner that put many more lives at risk than if they had arrested him quickly and quietly in a less populated area. If he was a suspect why wasn’t he arrested as soon as he left his house and taken for questioning? Ask yourself why the police decided, conciously, to take this action. It wasn’t as much of a split second decision as you are being led to believe. Wake up.”

It’ll be extremely interesting to see if it’s “approved” for posting on the page.

Update 00:15 26th July 2005:
The comment wasn’t posted. Funny that.

Has anyone considered the fact that perhaps… just maybe… he was running to catch THE FUCKING train, just like hundreds upon hundreds of commuters every day? Has anyone considered the fact that maybe… just maybe… he was listening to a personal stereo and couldn’t hear the “police”. The guy was Brazilian, ever wondered if, even if he could hear, that he’d even understand what was being shouted at him? Those are just possibilities.

Here’s another one for you… he saw the group of men in normal clothes pointing a gun at him (remember he’s a foreigner, and in an unfamiliar country) on the underground claiming to be police but not showing any form of identification. From any way you look at it they could just as easily be terrorists than police. But hold on…. because they said they were police, everyone is meant to just believe them and do as they say? If that were the case then terrorists might as well shout POLICE FREEZE before they blow themselves up. Now what would you have done in his situation?

Now… I’ve talked a lot about people waking up and realising this is bullshit. Here’s a link to a BBC “points of view” page about the shooting. Just by reading through people’s opinions you can see which people are waking up because they’re questioning why it happened and what the bigger picture is. People who are still asleep are people who say SHIT like Eliot Meikle from Dunbar, Scotland saying:
“I have sympathies with the victim’s family, but two weeks ago over 50 innocent people died. Let’s not forget that. It was very unfortunate that this lad died, but the risk of him being guilty was just too big a risk to take. The press should support the police against terrorism, not it would appear the other way around. This lad who died was another victim in the war against terrorism, unfortunate, but true. My thoughts are with the police officer and his family.”

I cannot describe the rage that fills me when i read that fucking dozy bint cunt mother fuckers statement up there. He/she is the DEFINITION of someone who is asleep, who WILL DO ANYTHING to stay asleep (she’s asking for the press to support a complete pile of bullshit so he/she can read it and sleep soundly knowing her government is in control), and will happily be totally enslaved and walk around shouting (he/she can’t run because otherwise they’d get shot), Bill Hicks style “WE ARE FREE TO DO AS OUR GOVERNMENT TELLS US!!”

Then is the saving grace.. the knowledge that more and more people are realising that the police and government are not what they appear… such as Sophie, London:
If a British citizen was shot here or in another country then there would be outrage and no rest until the culprits were punished. This poor man, who was going about his daily business, was panicked seeing men chasing him with guns. If the police had secured him to the ground then surely one shot to disable him would have been enough.

and Amy, Manchester:
I feel very scared for our future if this can be allowed to happen in our country. Britain has lived with terrorism for years without sinking to this level of paranoia. A man has lost his life here, another innocent victim. Of course he ran away, he was obviously terrified. If an American or British man had been killed I wonder if an apology would have been enough?

I stand up and APPLAUD Robert Pugsley, Birstall, UK:
It is astonishing how many people here seem to be justifying shooting people just because they are running away. Since when was jumping a barrier a capital offence? Of course the police have a very difficult job but it is possible that they got this wrong and as a result a man died. We cannot excuse everything the police do just because of the present situation. Otherwise we may as well live in a police state.

These few people are waking up.. not fully but they’re well on their way.

The official police statement said that this man was known to “intelligence services” (i don’t comprehend how they still have the audacity to include the word “intelligence” in their title) and that he was linked to the 7/7 attacks. If this was true, why wasn’t the man apprehended BEFORE he entered the underground? And by apprehended, i mean, arrested (not shot) by surprise with little or no warning, quickly and quietly. Instead they did the fucking stupidest thing that they could possibly have done. Just think…. LOGICALLY here people… if he WAS a suicide bomber he would’ve blown himself to smitherines rather than be arrested, and he would’ve done so as soon as he knew they were police. So pulling a gun on him and telling him to freeze in a public underground station put MORE people at risk, oh and, got a lot of media attention. In my opinion i want that policeman’s badge and see him face trial for murder. But no…. get ready for this… the police are above the law now. As can be seen in plain daylight following this incident. Just look at what Met Police Chief Sir Ian Blair is saying, that more innocent people might be killed in the fight against terrorism. WAKE UP PEOPLE!! Will it really take seeing police in ski masks wielding MP5A4′s in your nearest city to wake you up to the fact that it’s now a police state we live in?

Now… this may be a tough nugget to swallow, but if you’re living in Britain or America, you’re living in a facist, totalitarian dictatorship. One which is becoming not too dissimilar to Nazi Germany 65 years ago. I’ll bet you’re having a reaction to that right now. Good. Now, look at it totally objectively… uh huh, being told we’re going to war (without majority consensus), the systematic locking down (police control and fear of the MILITARISED police) and control of the population through propaganda (the mainstream media), the gradual persecution and social distrust of a religious minority (Islam)…. oh… and let’s not forget… the ILLEGAL OCCUPATION of a foreign countries (Iraq / Afghanistan).

If all that is a bit too much for you to take in, just tell yourself “It’s not facism when we do it”, then go back to sleep knowing your government is in control. A government with a chief of police who says more innocent people might need to be shot to fight “terror”. Sleep well, and think twice about running to catch that train.

The first video is a commentary (while on the phone) about the “breaking news” that Air France Flight AF050 destined for Chigago, USA was instructed to return to France for no stated reason. Just want to pick up on this. WHY is there still “heightened” tension around air flights FOUR years after 9/11? Because planes were flown into the Twin Towers? Bull shit. America wants control of global travel, they want to know who’s going where and when and why, and it sure as hell isn’t because of a fear of terrorism. The method of attack (aircraft) FOUR years ago was (and still is) subjected to scrutiny, yet the method of attack on Thursday (train and bus) wasn’t scrutinised at all, NORMAL SERVICE RESUMED less than 24 HOURS after these “bombs” went off. Yet air travel was grounded for weeks after the WTC attack. Go and figure that one out. IT DOESN’T STAND UP TO RATIONAL THOUGHT. Think about the number of people who go through Heathrow every day, and then think of the number of people who use the underground every day.
To watch the video [link=http://www.robbiejobbie.co.uk/media/BBC_propaganda.wmv]click here[/link]

The second video is my comments (also while on the phone) on a “staged” interview with a victim of one of the underground attacks, who was TEN metres away from the explosion but wasn’t visibly injured, there were no cuts or scratches on his face, no bandages around his head. Think about it… he’s 10 metres away from the blast but he looks like he hasn’t done anything more than fall off a two foot high ladder. After-all he might have a twisted ankle under that blanket, but seeing as how it’s covered with an NHS bed sheet, we don’t know. And his psychological attitude doesn’t reflect the medical condition of shock, or of experiencing a traumatic event. This guy would have seen dismembered people, blown apart bodies, mangled and disfigured bodies if he’d been in that carriage, yet he looks and sounds like he might have done nothing more than fall from a very short ladder.

Also covered is the staged bus (notice it’s on a side street). I could have a field day with this one. An eyewitness on the news today said that the police evacuated the bus PRIOR to the explosion and that he’d been in the vicinty of the bus since it happened and had seen everything unfold, but before he got the chance to go into further detail the interview was cut short and reporting was transferred back to the newsroom to avoid people lingering on this fact for too long. Then ten minutes later, after various thought diluting stories and weather bulletins they spent five minutes explaining how they’d just received a statement from the Metropitan Police, Scotland Yard and Jack Straw all saying they had no prior knowledge about the attacks. That’s a load of bullshit which requires it’s own in-depth explantion which I’ll do tomorrow. The official media cover-story was blown, so they needed to patch it. Later this evening there was a special tried-and-tested microcosm story focussing on one man who had been on the underground, was told to evacuate and was forced to leave the tube station and get a bus to continue his journey. He changed buses and caught the number 30 (the one that “exploded”). Now, this is where the patch of the offical story kicks in. And you might really want to pay attention to this bit because it will come out in a few days, the media can’t cover this one up any more. The man being interviewed told the reporter of the program that the bus stopped because the road ahead was blocked (he neglected to specify HOW it was blocked). Then the bus driver apparently said that everyone should probably get off because “this bus is going nowhere”. “Seconds later” it exploded. Now that’s a tad co-incidental, don’t you think? When you’re watching the video, notice the seat which is lying on the side of the road. There’s NO damage to it. I’ve seen vandalised seats that look worse than that one, and vandals don’t use explosives on bus seats all too often.

Next in this video is the way the mass media is being told how and what to think. It’s pretty self-explanatory in the video. Pay attention to what he says. “The public MUST be patient”… we have to get our story straight before we make any more mistakes.
To watch this video [link=http://www.robbiejobbie.co.uk/media/Bus_examination_and_subliminal_control.wmv]click here[/link]

These [b]weren’t[/b] “terror” attacks, they were mild panic attacks.

what has REALLY flamed my fury is what the BBC have just reported that Jack Straw has said the attacks (the BBC neglected to actually specifically say the London attacks) had the “hallmarks of an al-Qaeda related attack”. LOOK! WAKE UP PEOPLE AND SMELL THE BULLSHIT wafting from your nearest media outlet, [b]don’t[/b] just blindly accept this. Look at what the “hallmarks of an al-Qaeda attack” are…

* 1980′s Embassy bombings in the US: HIGH visibility, HIGHLY explosive, HIGH fatalities
* 2001 WTC attack: HIGH visibility (understatement), HIGHLY explosive, HIGH fatalities (understatement again)
* 2004 Madrid bombings: HIGH visibility, HIGHLY explosive, HIGH fatalities
now… 2005 London bombings: LOW visibility, LOW explosive (mostly incidiary explosives), LOW fatalities

How in ANY way can this be related to the MO (modus operandi) of alCIAda ahem i mean al-Qaeda? Because it ISNT.

After 9/11 the powers that be knew that they went “too big”, too many people (especially outside America) began to realise that it was a set-up. They achieved their goal though, to go to war and harvest oil and oh so conveniently control the minds of a nation in the process, they killed two birds with one stone. They managed to do this because they knew the mind of the average American is easily suceptible to propaganda and they’d blindly support their government over a cliff (which ironically isn’t far from what has actually happened).

The British mind-set is entirely different, we’re a population far more aware of the global situation (albeit the one that’s reported in the mass media), far more tolerant of that situation and less suceptible to having the wool pulled over our eyes by the government. Just look at what the public think of the 45 minute dossier the UK government produced as a case for the Iraq war, look at the mass anti-war demonstrations before the conflict started etc. We’ve lived with IRA attacks in the 70′s, 80′s and 90′s. Our soil is no stranger to terrorist attacks.

As a result the powers that be (the world government trying to seize control of global power (people in our government are involved too)) needed a dramatically different style of “terrorist attack” for the UK. They knew they couldn’t pull another 9/11 style attack… that would be FAR too suspicious, and they definately couldn’t pull a 9/11 style attack in the UK because the British people would be a helluva lot more suspicious of that.

A small attack would be just about right. Low loss of life means less possibility of a full scale, in depth investigation (which was the downfall for the planners of the 9/11 attacks, it was too big, too much attention). If the fatalaties had been high the British people would start stirring in their sleep (the Americans, by contrast are in a comatose state). Don’t be surprised to see the number of fatalaties rise, they’ll probably steadily incease until the media feels the nation has reached a delicate balance between outrage and disbelief. I wouldn’t be surprised to wake in the morning to hear “overnight developments” have occurred which has resulted in the number of fatalities increasing.

Let’s have a look at the timing… because with the New World Order timing is everything. The British people (who are president and host of the G8 summit this year, lest we forget) have been focusing too much on Live8, reducing poverty and 3rd world debt. We’ve been concentrating on doing too many positive things and not on “terrorism” like we’re [i]supposed[/i] to be doing. Dur. We needed our concentration re-directing back onto the “war on terrorism”, so America and co can justify possible further action in the middle eastern countries holding the last of the world’s petroleum supplies. Afghanistan and Iraq are ticked off, the American’s have their fingers in those pies already. Saudi Arabia is propping up Bush’s economy through generous donations to his family and business interests, so that’s another finger in another oil producing pie. But the NWO want to get their little finger into more oil fields. Don’t be surprised if all this staged hoo ha in London leads to “justified” (in quotes for a damn good reason) military action in say… i don’t know, Iran, or quite possibly Syria.

Ok, but why? Striking off 3rd world debt… now that’s gonna be expensive. More aid to Africa…. yup, expensive again. Why risk losing money at the G8 summit by agreeing to these ideas when you can MAKE money out of the summit by focussing on terrorism again and getting a hold of more oil to secure future interests. But how can you do that? How about an impromptu terrorist attack to revive the old “conquer and divide” spirit. And that is EXACTLY what has happened today. Dont blame al-Qaeda, they don’t exist. Instead, look deeper.

I’ve just written this in about an hour, it’s not fully researched but I’m confident the majority is sound. Addendums will be made to this entry to reflect changes in the soon to transpire events.

[b]Added: 08/07/05 12:35[/b]
Have a look [link=http://www.flickr.com/photos/nika7k/24267508/in/pool-londonexplosions/]here[/link] to see comments from some people who are starting to realise (if only on a surface level) that what they see on the news isn’t what it seems.

[b]Added: 08/07/05 14:32[/b]
Oh look, I was right. Quote from the BBC News 24 main news page: “The toll from the London bombs will be at least 50, police say as they launch a massive hunt for the bombers.” That’s quite a jump from 2 (reported yesterday morning at 11am, to 33 (quite a leap) yesterday at 2pm, and now 50! Ask yourself why, in this world of such up-close reporting, there is no steady count, there’s no footage of rescuers pulling critically injured people from underground stations etc. No footage of people in critical condition, and there’s sure as hell no footage of body bags. And no names of the people who died. Why? Because that would be inflammatory, too brazen and would draw too much attention to a human impact. A human impact that would leave the British people asking too many questions. Nothing apart from the very vague, shadowy details are being reported.

REALLY think about this people. Rush hour London Underground, thousands upon thousands of people using that Underground EVERY day at that time. “7″ explosions (a number which also steadily increased throughout the day and stopped at 7… OH LOOK HOW CONVENIENT! 7 explosions on the 7th day of the seventh month. Co-incidence? I think not…
So, these tens of thousands of people using the London Underground at rush hour. A tempting target for a terrorist attack, and potentially a very harmful one. al-Qaeda’s MO is lots of fatalities, as many as possible, while delivering a clear message. THINK about it SEVEN bombs go off but only “50 people die”. Don’t you think that’s an AWFULLY low number? You may think I’m insensitive to the people who died, or are alleged to have died, but it’s clear as day that this wasn’t a terrorist attack, and it definately wasn’t an al-Qaeda one. People are getting caught up in the microcosms of what happened and not looking at the bigger picture.
So look, 7 bombs, on the 7th day of the 7th month, that’ll be something for the media to drill into the general population easily. Don’t be that foolish.

[b]Added: 08/07/05 19:10[/b]
I have created a forum to let people discuss their views on not only my blog post but any other ideas they have. [link=http://www.robbiejobbie.co.uk/stuff/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1.last]Click here to go to the fourm[/link]