Video analysis
After watching the news for just one hour last night I found so many glaring mistakes / propaganda / subliminal messages it would’ve provided me with enough to comment on for a week. I decided to record the hour of news from the BBC to highlight and point out exactly what is happening that people really need to wake up and see.
The first video is a commentary (while on the phone) about the “breaking news” that Air France Flight AF050 destined for Chigago, USA was instructed to return to France for no stated reason. Just want to pick up on this. WHY is there still “heightened” tension around air flights FOUR years after 9/11? Because planes were flown into the Twin Towers? Bull shit. America wants control of global travel, they want to know who’s going where and when and why, and it sure as hell isn’t because of a fear of terrorism. The method of attack (aircraft) FOUR years ago was (and still is) subjected to scrutiny, yet the method of attack on Thursday (train and bus) wasn’t scrutinised at all, NORMAL SERVICE RESUMED less than 24 HOURS after these “bombs” went off. Yet air travel was grounded for weeks after the WTC attack. Go and figure that one out. IT DOESN’T STAND UP TO RATIONAL THOUGHT. Think about the number of people who go through Heathrow every day, and then think of the number of people who use the underground every day.
To watch the video [link=http://www.robbiejobbie.co.uk/media/BBC_propaganda.wmv]click here[/link]
The second video is my comments (also while on the phone) on a “staged” interview with a victim of one of the underground attacks, who was TEN metres away from the explosion but wasn’t visibly injured, there were no cuts or scratches on his face, no bandages around his head. Think about it… he’s 10 metres away from the blast but he looks like he hasn’t done anything more than fall off a two foot high ladder. After-all he might have a twisted ankle under that blanket, but seeing as how it’s covered with an NHS bed sheet, we don’t know. And his psychological attitude doesn’t reflect the medical condition of shock, or of experiencing a traumatic event. This guy would have seen dismembered people, blown apart bodies, mangled and disfigured bodies if he’d been in that carriage, yet he looks and sounds like he might have done nothing more than fall from a very short ladder.
Also covered is the staged bus (notice it’s on a side street). I could have a field day with this one. An eyewitness on the news today said that the police evacuated the bus PRIOR to the explosion and that he’d been in the vicinty of the bus since it happened and had seen everything unfold, but before he got the chance to go into further detail the interview was cut short and reporting was transferred back to the newsroom to avoid people lingering on this fact for too long. Then ten minutes later, after various thought diluting stories and weather bulletins they spent five minutes explaining how they’d just received a statement from the Metropitan Police, Scotland Yard and Jack Straw all saying they had no prior knowledge about the attacks. That’s a load of bullshit which requires it’s own in-depth explantion which I’ll do tomorrow. The official media cover-story was blown, so they needed to patch it. Later this evening there was a special tried-and-tested microcosm story focussing on one man who had been on the underground, was told to evacuate and was forced to leave the tube station and get a bus to continue his journey. He changed buses and caught the number 30 (the one that “exploded”). Now, this is where the patch of the offical story kicks in. And you might really want to pay attention to this bit because it will come out in a few days, the media can’t cover this one up any more. The man being interviewed told the reporter of the program that the bus stopped because the road ahead was blocked (he neglected to specify HOW it was blocked). Then the bus driver apparently said that everyone should probably get off because “this bus is going nowhere”. “Seconds later” it exploded. Now that’s a tad co-incidental, don’t you think? When you’re watching the video, notice the seat which is lying on the side of the road. There’s NO damage to it. I’ve seen vandalised seats that look worse than that one, and vandals don’t use explosives on bus seats all too often.
Next in this video is the way the mass media is being told how and what to think. It’s pretty self-explanatory in the video. Pay attention to what he says. “The public MUST be patient”… we have to get our story straight before we make any more mistakes.
To watch this video [link=http://www.robbiejobbie.co.uk/media/Bus_examination_and_subliminal_control.wmv]click here[/link]
These [b]weren’t[/b] “terror” attacks, they were mild panic attacks.


No comments yet.