I am SO ANGRY!!! And not for the reason that you think I might be. I’M FUCKING LIVID with the sheer stupidity of the average human in developed countries, because they’re sitting in front of their TEEVEE’s this evening swallowing every bitesize chunk of disinformation and SHIT that the media and world government (note the singular) is feeding them and then saying “yummy! control my perceptions more please”

what has REALLY flamed my fury is what the BBC have just reported that Jack Straw has said the attacks (the BBC neglected to actually specifically say the London attacks) had the “hallmarks of an al-Qaeda related attack”. LOOK! WAKE UP PEOPLE AND SMELL THE BULLSHIT wafting from your nearest media outlet, [b]don’t[/b] just blindly accept this. Look at what the “hallmarks of an al-Qaeda attack” are…

* 1980′s Embassy bombings in the US: HIGH visibility, HIGHLY explosive, HIGH fatalities
* 2001 WTC attack: HIGH visibility (understatement), HIGHLY explosive, HIGH fatalities (understatement again)
* 2004 Madrid bombings: HIGH visibility, HIGHLY explosive, HIGH fatalities
now… 2005 London bombings: LOW visibility, LOW explosive (mostly incidiary explosives), LOW fatalities

How in ANY way can this be related to the MO (modus operandi) of alCIAda ahem i mean al-Qaeda? Because it ISNT.

After 9/11 the powers that be knew that they went “too big”, too many people (especially outside America) began to realise that it was a set-up. They achieved their goal though, to go to war and harvest oil and oh so conveniently control the minds of a nation in the process, they killed two birds with one stone. They managed to do this because they knew the mind of the average American is easily suceptible to propaganda and they’d blindly support their government over a cliff (which ironically isn’t far from what has actually happened).

The British mind-set is entirely different, we’re a population far more aware of the global situation (albeit the one that’s reported in the mass media), far more tolerant of that situation and less suceptible to having the wool pulled over our eyes by the government. Just look at what the public think of the 45 minute dossier the UK government produced as a case for the Iraq war, look at the mass anti-war demonstrations before the conflict started etc. We’ve lived with IRA attacks in the 70′s, 80′s and 90′s. Our soil is no stranger to terrorist attacks.

As a result the powers that be (the world government trying to seize control of global power (people in our government are involved too)) needed a dramatically different style of “terrorist attack” for the UK. They knew they couldn’t pull another 9/11 style attack… that would be FAR too suspicious, and they definately couldn’t pull a 9/11 style attack in the UK because the British people would be a helluva lot more suspicious of that.

A small attack would be just about right. Low loss of life means less possibility of a full scale, in depth investigation (which was the downfall for the planners of the 9/11 attacks, it was too big, too much attention). If the fatalaties had been high the British people would start stirring in their sleep (the Americans, by contrast are in a comatose state). Don’t be surprised to see the number of fatalaties rise, they’ll probably steadily incease until the media feels the nation has reached a delicate balance between outrage and disbelief. I wouldn’t be surprised to wake in the morning to hear “overnight developments” have occurred which has resulted in the number of fatalities increasing.

Let’s have a look at the timing… because with the New World Order timing is everything. The British people (who are president and host of the G8 summit this year, lest we forget) have been focusing too much on Live8, reducing poverty and 3rd world debt. We’ve been concentrating on doing too many positive things and not on “terrorism” like we’re [i]supposed[/i] to be doing. Dur. We needed our concentration re-directing back onto the “war on terrorism”, so America and co can justify possible further action in the middle eastern countries holding the last of the world’s petroleum supplies. Afghanistan and Iraq are ticked off, the American’s have their fingers in those pies already. Saudi Arabia is propping up Bush’s economy through generous donations to his family and business interests, so that’s another finger in another oil producing pie. But the NWO want to get their little finger into more oil fields. Don’t be surprised if all this staged hoo ha in London leads to “justified” (in quotes for a damn good reason) military action in say… i don’t know, Iran, or quite possibly Syria.

Ok, but why? Striking off 3rd world debt… now that’s gonna be expensive. More aid to Africa…. yup, expensive again. Why risk losing money at the G8 summit by agreeing to these ideas when you can MAKE money out of the summit by focussing on terrorism again and getting a hold of more oil to secure future interests. But how can you do that? How about an impromptu terrorist attack to revive the old “conquer and divide” spirit. And that is EXACTLY what has happened today. Dont blame al-Qaeda, they don’t exist. Instead, look deeper.

I’ve just written this in about an hour, it’s not fully researched but I’m confident the majority is sound. Addendums will be made to this entry to reflect changes in the soon to transpire events.

[b]Added: 08/07/05 12:35[/b]
Have a look [link=http://www.flickr.com/photos/nika7k/24267508/in/pool-londonexplosions/]here[/link] to see comments from some people who are starting to realise (if only on a surface level) that what they see on the news isn’t what it seems.

[b]Added: 08/07/05 14:32[/b]
Oh look, I was right. Quote from the BBC News 24 main news page: “The toll from the London bombs will be at least 50, police say as they launch a massive hunt for the bombers.” That’s quite a jump from 2 (reported yesterday morning at 11am, to 33 (quite a leap) yesterday at 2pm, and now 50! Ask yourself why, in this world of such up-close reporting, there is no steady count, there’s no footage of rescuers pulling critically injured people from underground stations etc. No footage of people in critical condition, and there’s sure as hell no footage of body bags. And no names of the people who died. Why? Because that would be inflammatory, too brazen and would draw too much attention to a human impact. A human impact that would leave the British people asking too many questions. Nothing apart from the very vague, shadowy details are being reported.

REALLY think about this people. Rush hour London Underground, thousands upon thousands of people using that Underground EVERY day at that time. “7″ explosions (a number which also steadily increased throughout the day and stopped at 7… OH LOOK HOW CONVENIENT! 7 explosions on the 7th day of the seventh month. Co-incidence? I think not…
So, these tens of thousands of people using the London Underground at rush hour. A tempting target for a terrorist attack, and potentially a very harmful one. al-Qaeda’s MO is lots of fatalities, as many as possible, while delivering a clear message. THINK about it SEVEN bombs go off but only “50 people die”. Don’t you think that’s an AWFULLY low number? You may think I’m insensitive to the people who died, or are alleged to have died, but it’s clear as day that this wasn’t a terrorist attack, and it definately wasn’t an al-Qaeda one. People are getting caught up in the microcosms of what happened and not looking at the bigger picture.
So look, 7 bombs, on the 7th day of the 7th month, that’ll be something for the media to drill into the general population easily. Don’t be that foolish.

[b]Added: 08/07/05 19:10[/b]
I have created a forum to let people discuss their views on not only my blog post but any other ideas they have. [link=http://www.robbiejobbie.co.uk/stuff/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1.last]Click here to go to the fourm[/link]